Three SGML metadata formats: TEI, EAD, and CIMI Work Package 1 of Telematics for Libraries project BIBLINK (LB 4034)

Title page Table of Contents Previous - Next

Contents

• 1 Introduction
• 2 Overview of the schemes studied
  • 2.1 The Text Encoding Initiative
    • 2.1.1 The TEI Header
    • 2.1.2 Sample TEI Headers
    • 2.1.3 Other forms of metadata
  • 2.2 EAD
    • 2.2.1 Background
    • 2.2.2 EAD header
    • 2.2.3 Sample EAD header
    • 2.2.4 EAD finding aid
  • 2.3 CIMI records
    • 2.3.1 A TEI application
    • 2.3.2 CIMI Access Points
    • 2.3.3 Topics
    • 2.3.4 Contexts
    • 2.3.5 Sample CIMI meta-record
    • 2.3.6 Inheritance
    • 2.3.7 Linking and naming
• 3 Technical context
  • 3.1 The role of a DTD
  • 3.2 Descriptive or prescriptive?
  • 3.3 Hyperlinks
  • 3.4 SGML for quality control
  • 3.5 SGML in resource discovery
• 4 Comparative analysis
  • 4.1 User Community
    4.1.1 TEI headers
    • 4.1.2 EAD
    • 4.1.3 CIMI records
  • 4.2 Control agency
    • 4.2.1 TEI headers
    • 4.2.2 EAD
    • 4.2.3 CIMI records
  • 4.3 Expression of metadata
    • 4.3.1 TEI headers
    • 4.3.2 EAD
    • 4.3.3 CIMI records
  • 4.4 Metadata concepts supported
    • 4.4.1 TEI headers
    • 4.4.2 EAD
    • 4.4.3 CIMI records
    • 4.4.4 Summary of feature coverage
  • 4.5 Rules for formulation of content
    • 4.5.1 TEI headers
    • 4.5.2 EAD
    • 4.5.3 CIMI records
  • 4.6 Extensibility
    • 4.6.1 TEI headers
    • 4.6.2 EAD
    • 4.6.3 CIMI records
  • 4.7 Future development path
    • 4.7.1 TEI headers
    • 4.7.2 EAD
    • 4.7.3 CIMI records
  • 4.8 Relationship to other metadata schemes
    • 4.8.1 Dublin Core
    • 4.8.2 MARC
• 5 Conclusions
  • 5.1 Using SGML to represent metadata
  • 5.2 The three schemes studied
  • 5.3 Use of schemes in combination
• 6 References

Next	Table of Contents